One list, both sides
The policy your team writes is the policy the applicant works through. Neither side is reading a copy of the other side’s notes.
Write down the documents and details you need from the people you onboard. Pagebread turns that list into what each applicant sees, one link and one checklist, and checks every submission back against it.
Business borrower onboarding
Checked against the policy: 1 of 5 requirements still outstanding.
The policy your team writes is the policy the applicant works through. Neither side is reading a copy of the other side’s notes.
Every submission arrives checked for presence against the policy it came from, so you start the review already knowing where to look.
Collecting documents is rarely the hard part. Agreeing on what to collect is, and so is knowing, on any given morning, which of forty people has sent which of six things.
The list lives in somebody’s head, and two colleagues onboarding the same kind of customer remember it differently. Nobody finds out until the exception does.
Documents arrive by email, over chat, as photographs of a screen, one at a time, from people who cannot see what is still outstanding on their own application.
Answering “what is left on this one” means opening a spreadsheet, an inbox and a folder of scans, and trusting that all three agree with each other.
List the details and the documents you require. Mark what is mandatory, and say how each item should be supplied.
The list stops being remembered and starts being defined.
The policy becomes a flow with its own link. Invite named applicants to it, or publish it openly and let people start from the link.
One address to send, instead of an email you rewrite each time.
They answer the questions and upload what they have, from a phone if that is what they are holding, and return later to see where they stand.
They can see what is outstanding without asking you.
Each submission arrives checked for presence against the policy it came from, with a checklist of what was supplied and what is still missing.
You start the review already knowing where to look.
The policy your team writes is the same policy the applicant works through. Neither side is reading a copy of the other side’s notes.
The evidence differs. The problem does not: a defined list of what is required, a set of people who have to supply it, and a need to know where each of them has got to.
An organization’s credential is checked with the authentication provider on every single request, on the server. Sign out, and the next request is already refused.
The credential an applicant holds and the credential your team holds are different mechanisms, verified in different places. Neither can stand in for the other.
An uploaded document has no URL anyone can hold on to. It is opened through a signed link that stops working after five minutes.
Uploads are evidence for your review. Where you are required to see an original, you still see the original: Pagebread gets you to that meeting with the checking already done, rather than replacing it.
This section is here rather than at the top on purpose. In this category these are the floor, not the argument, and a page that opens with them is telling you it has nothing better to say.
Write down what you require for a single kind of applicant, publish the flow, and send it to the next person you onboard. That is the whole of the first use.